![]() | ![]() |
| | Discussions: 4,171 | Messages: 50,985 | Members: 744 | Online: 19 | Newest : deb (Welcome!) |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| Coffee Talk Welcome to Coffee Talk It's no big whoop, just *non-aviation related* chit chat... Bring up a topic, Discuss amongst yourselves and try not to get verklempt! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Ol' School Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: oklahoma
Posts: 645
Recipes: Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
| Hey there. I had to laugh-hard the other night when I opened my Readers Digest and found this article. Airplane Pilot Shares His Thoughts | Your America | Reader's Digest I particularly like the part where he assures his passengers that he doesn't have any scissors or oversized shampoo bottles either! ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm a little surprized to see it in a very wide-reaching magazine like this but GREAT! Now if he'd only thrown in comments about pay and down time in airports...... There is a lot more to the article in the actual magazine. It talks a lot about pilot fatigue and low entry hours due to fewer pilots coming in to the field from the military. It also mentions that "the industry will need to hire 100,000 new pilots by 2020 to keep up with demand according to Air Inc, a company that tracks pilot hirings; this exceeds the current capacity of flight schools." Very interesting..... Jackie
__________________ Welcoming baby #3 this spring! ![]() |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Imachickadee75 For This Useful Post: |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: US
Posts: 421
Recipes: Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
| Now that IS great!! I'm more happy to see this article in a magazine like this than I would be if it were in a newspaper. Don't get me wrong, newspapers are great, but the article would only be out there for one day. Now it'll be on display for an entire month! Woo hoo. Hopefully, it'll open at least a few people's eyes. It'll be interesting to read letters to the editor next month. I actually do have a subscription... was this in July's? I don't think I have it yet. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Ol' School Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: oklahoma
Posts: 645
Recipes: Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
| Yup July's edition. Pretty great huh? Jackie
__________________ Welcoming baby #3 this spring! ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Plus Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Nashville, TN USA
Posts: 687
Recipes: Thanks: 9
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
| Oh that is great! I love it. I can't wait to send it to hubby. I'm pretty sure our reader's digest hasn't come in the mail yet, so I also love that he will be reading it first from me! Thanks! |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 44
Recipes: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I don't quite like the jab at the regional jets, but aside from that it was entertaining.
__________________ Joanna --------------- Wife of a CAL 737 FO, Mom to baby Benny |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Plus Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Nashville, TN USA
Posts: 687
Recipes: Thanks: 9
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
| The article to the right about air traffic control industry is pretty interesting too. Iamachickadee75, your post has all sorts of good reading. Thanks! Quick Study: Air Traffic Control | Your America | Reader's Digest |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Jetgirls Ol' School Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Idaho
Posts: 859
Recipes: Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
| I'm going to up it up in the brekroom at MY work. to bad they didn't say anthing about pay, then that would take care of the "if my husband was a pilot I wouldn't wok..."
__________________ He wasn't sure he wanted a baby sister, but he loved her the moment he saw her. |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
![]() |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 | ![]() |